Ex1:
has 4 positive real roots. Then prove that
a)
b)
Let be the roots.
(a)
Using AM ≥ GM for :
Using AM ≥ GM for :
Multiplying the two inequalities:
(b)
Using AM ≥ GM for :
Ex2: Prove that if a,b,c are positive numbers then:
Method1:
Add 1 to each fraction:
(b+c)/a + 1 + ... >= 9
=> (a+b+c)[1/a + 1/b + 1/c] >= 9
=> (a+b+c)/3 >= 3/[1/a + 1/b + 1/c]
Which is nothing but
A.M. >= H.M. for a,b,c
H.P.
Method2:
Rewrite the given inequality as:
b/a + c/a + c/b + a/b + a/c + b/c >= 6
[b/a + c/a + c/b + a/b + a/c + b/c]/6 >= 1
1 on the R.H.S can be written as:
[b/a * c/a * c/b * a/b * a/c * b/c] since everything cancels out.
So again it's proven using A.M. >= G.M.
Ex3:
Given , prove that:
Solution:
Simply do A.M. >= G.M. for the given 4 numbers
(1 + a + a^2 + a^3)/4 >= (1 * a * a^2 * a^3)^(1/4) = a^(3/2)
=> (1 + a + a^2 + a^3) >= = 4.a^(3/2)
=> (1 + a + a^2 + a^3)^2 >= = 16.a^(3)
H.P.
Ex4.
are positive numbers.
Prove that
Solution:
Straightforward application of A.M. >= G.M. on a1^n, a2^n ... an^n
Ex5.
Given:
Prove that:
Solution:
Given:
Rewrite the given inequality as:
Using AM ≥ GM:
For the pair :
For :
For :
Multiplying (i), (ii), and (iii):
Ex6.
are positive numbers such that
Then prove that:
From the condition:
Using AM ≥ GM for :
Similarly:
Multiplying all three inequalities:
Ex7:
Prove that:
Approach using AM ≥ GM on pairs:
So, in general:
Now take:
So multiplying both sides:
Ex8:
Prove that:
Given that are 4 distinct positive numbers.
Solution:
Given:
Expanded as:
Apply AM ≥ GM on these 8 terms:
So:
Thus:
Equality in AM = GM holds only if , but since the values are 4 distinct positive numbers, strict inequality holds:
Ex9:
Let , where are 4 positive numbers.
Prove that:
Solution:
Prove that:
Where
From the definition:
Apply AM ≥ GM to :
Similarly:
Multiply all four inequalities:
Simplifying the product inside the cube root:
Thus, the inequality is proven:
Comments
Post a Comment